Somewhere in your organization there is something valuable that isn't yet a system. I take the chair and stay accountable for it; my team builds alongside me. We run it until it works, then hand it to your people with the training to keep it. Then we go.
A consultant delivers a recommendation and leaves, which is why those engagements run six weeks and why so many of them end up in a drawer. The recommendation was probably right. Nobody had the capacity to execute it.
I don't sell recommendations. I take the chair. For nine to eighteen months I am accountable for the function the same way an employee would be, for the number, the governance, the reporting cadence and the outcome. Then I train your people and hand it over.
Because you can't hire for a function that doesn't exist yet. The job description would be guesswork, the search would take seven months, and the person you eventually hired would spend their first year building the thing you needed last year.
Bring me in to build it and prove it works. By the time you write that job description, it describes a real job with a real playbook, and the person who takes it inherits something that already runs.
Structured interviews with leadership, internal teams, customers and partners. A real baseline: not the one in the deck. Then the design: operating model, process, segmentation, positioning, measurement framework, and the KPIs the function will be held to.
I run it, personally, and accountable for the result, with my team carrying the build wherever the work needs more than one pair of hands. Systems and dashboards go live, the work gets done in the open, and the operating discipline gets established by being practiced, not documented. Bi-weekly status, monthly strategic review.
Training, playbooks, governance, and a named owner for every piece. Relationships and ownership transition deliberately, not abruptly. The engagement ends when your team runs it without me, which is written into the scope from day one.
Timings shown are illustrative of a full-length engagement. A shorter build compresses the same three movements.
The chair is mine. I am the one accountable to your board for the number, the governance and the outcome, and I do the work that decides whether it holds.
Behind that chair is a team of designers, analysts and facilitators I bring in as the scope requires, so capacity is never the reason something slips. On consulting engagements my team carries the build under my direction. What you are buying is a working function, with the capacity behind it to stand one up.
Coaching is the exception, and deliberately so. When I coach a leader, that is me. It does not get delegated.
The first is the whole model. The rest are the pieces of it, available on their own.
I hold a chief officer's chair on a fractional basis, learning, talent, revenue, consulting, or data, and build the function underneath it. Currently held: Chief Data and Consulting Officer of a venture-stage workforce-intelligence platform.
I also serve on the National Advisory Board of Independent Sector's Center of Excellence on the Nonprofit Workforce, guiding research and policy for the sector's workforce.
Shape: 9–18 months, retained monthly, with capability transfer written into the scope.
Revenue infrastructure and strategic account management. Talent and learning strategy. Organizational effectiveness and change. Operating models, measurement frameworks, and the dashboards that make performance visible to a board.
Shape: project or retained, scoped after a discovery conversation. Delivered by my team under my direction where the scope calls for it.
Skills-based programs built to hold up under scrutiny: module-to-skill crosswalks, artifact-based evidence rather than attendance, scored rubrics, and equity-centered measurement re-checked at 90 and 180 days.
Shape: design engagement, optionally with delivery.
Executive convenings, leadership offsites, cohort sessions, and experiential workshops. Signature keynote: Mastering the Transformation Curve. As faculty I teach social identity and executive leadership to senior executives, and have graduated 700+ of them from IBM, Deloitte, Merck, Capital One, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Accenture and others at a 97 NPS.
Shape: single day, series, or full program facilitation.
Generative, agentic, and AI employees put where they actually take cost and cycle time out, not a pilot that impresses a board and then dies in procurement. I map the work first, then decide what a model should draft, what an agent should run end to end, what an AI employee should own as a standing role, and what stays human because judgment is the product. Then I build the guardrails, because in this work the organization usually outruns its own governance long before the technology becomes the problem.
I hold the AI and data strategy chair at a workforce-intelligence platform and run the Leadership track for an Institute serving 10,000 learners, so this comes from operating it, not from reading about it.
Shape: assessment and roadmap, or an embedded build alongside a broader engagement.
The executive I coach privately is very often the executive you are about to lose and can't figure out why. Corporate development work and individual coaching turn out to be the same problem at two altitudes. Sponsored coaching for a named leader, or for a cohort, with aggregate reporting to the sponsor and confidentiality for the individual.
How the coaching worksDifferent sectors, different problems, same shape. Further names available in conversation where permission allows.
An organization with extraordinary relationships and no machine to convert them into revenue. We designed the operating model and pipeline architecture, segmented the audiences, built the value propositions and sales toolkits, stood up the dashboards and forecasting, and I personally worked the pipeline against a seven-figure new-sales target while embedding Strategic Account Management capability across the staff.
Independent Sector's Advocacy Activation Validation Series runs a validation cohort of 13 nonprofits to prove the model before it scales digitally to the sector's 1.8 million organizations. It is built on skills crosswalks, artifact-based evidence on four-point rubrics, equity-centered measurement, and durability checks at 90 and 180 days instead of a smile sheet at the end. I designed the architecture and I'm in the room facilitating the convenings.
A workforce-intelligence company with a proprietary assessment, a growing dataset, and no consulting function to turn either into client impact. As co-founder and Chief Data and Consulting Officer I own the operating model, the AI and data strategy, the scoring metric, the productized offerings and the delivery tooling, starting hands-on with no direct reports and scaling a hybrid team from there.
Nearly two decades in Human Resources, doing exactly this work with a budget and a headcount behind it. As VP of Global Talent Management at Equifax I ran talent strategy for 20,000 workers across 26 countries, architected a leadership institute developing 2,000 leaders a year, and created myOnboarding, a new global program running day −15 to day 365 for 3,000 employees a year, 95% satisfaction, first-year retention up 21%, measured at 30, 90 and 180 days and again at a year.
Six roles across ten years at Randstad, ending as Director of Organizational Effectiveness: a $3M budget, a team of thirteen, ten lines of business, and a global HQ assignment in the Netherlands I was selected for out of 500 HR professionals worldwide.
Four degrees: a doctorate in organizational leadership specializing in leading change and innovation, an MBA, a master's in career counseling, and a bachelor's in finance and accounting, plus a Lean Six Sigma green belt from Georgia Tech. The finance degree is why I can build a forecast. The career counseling degree is why I design change around the people who have to live inside it.

The same five steps I use with a leader, pointed at a system. An organization cannot release what it has not owned either.
I don't publish corporate rates, because I've never scoped two engagements the same way. What happens instead: a conversation about what's actually missing, a short written proposal with phases, deliverables, governance and fee, and a decision. No pitch deck, no discovery invoice.
If it turns out you need something I'm not the right person to build, I'll tell you that in the first conversation rather than the third.